Edouard.ai
Back to blogSociété & Politique

Public vs Private: The Fiscal Inequality Ruining French Entrepreneurs

February 3, 2026
13 min read
636 views

Public vs Private: The Fiscal Inequality Ruining French Entrepreneurs


Table of Contents

  1. The Two Frances: Key Figures
  2. The Entrepreneur: All Risks, All Controls
  3. The Civil Servant: Zero Risk, Zero Control
  4. Elected Officials: The Supreme Privilege
  5. The Comparison Table: Two Worlds
  6. The Real Ratio: Who Creates Wealth?
  7. What the Numbers Reveal
  8. Conclusion: A System at Breaking Point
  9. Official Sources

"The entrepreneur takes all the risks, endures all the audits, and can lose everything overnight. The civil servant risks nothing, is never audited, and can almost never be dismissed. Both pay taxes. But only one creates the wealth that funds the other."

In France, the official discourse praises "national solidarity" and the "social model." But behind these words, a data-driven reality reveals a two-speed system where those who take risks and create value are systematically more controlled, more taxed, and less protected than those who live off their contributions.

This article presents verifiable facts, drawn from official sources: INSEE, Bank of France, URSSAF, DGAFP, Court of Auditors. No ideology -- just the numbers that no one puts into perspective.


The Two Frances: Key Figures

5.8 million public agents, 1.77 workers per retiree: the inverted pyramid.

Public Employment vs Private Employment

Indicator Figure Source
Public service agents 5.8 million INSEE, 2023
Share of total employment 19% INSEE
Market sector employment ~13.9 million INSEE
Non-market sector employment ~8.9 million INSEE

At the end of 2023, France counts 5.8 million public agents divided among:

  • State public service (FPE): 2.57 million
  • Local public service (FPT): 1.99 million
  • Hospital public service (FPH): 1.24 million

Source: INSEE -- Employment in the public service in 2023

The Worker/Retiree Ratio: The Ticking Time Bomb

Year Contributors/Retirees Ratio
2004 2.02
2015 1.71
2023 1.77
2060 (projection) 1.5

In 2023: 30.4 million contributors for 17.2 million retirees.

Each worker today funds the pensions of 0.57 retirees. Conversely, each retiree depends on the labor of 1.77 workers.

But this ratio does not distinguish between workers who create market value (entrepreneurs, private sector employees) and those who consume this value (civil servants, subsidized workers). The reality is far harsher.

Source: INSEE -- Contributors, retirees and demographic ratio


The Entrepreneur: All Risks, All Controls

67,830 bankruptcies in 2024: a record since 2009.

67,830 Bankruptcies in 2024: A Record

The year 2024 set a grim record:

Indicator 2024 Figure Change
Business failures 67,830 Record since 2009
Jobs threatened 256,000 +43% vs 2019
Share of micro-businesses (<5 employees) 86% -
Direct liquidations (micro-businesses) 73% -

Source: IFRAP Foundation, Bank of France

86% of bankruptcies concern businesses with fewer than 5 employees. 73% of these micro-businesses have no chance of recovery: they are liquidated directly.

Causes of Failures

  1. Late payments: 85% of businesses affected, average delay 51 days (vs 32 in Germany)
  2. End of COVID aid: post-PGE (state-guaranteed loan) catch-up
  3. Rising interest rates: cash flow absorbed by repayments
  4. Tax and social charges: relentless pressure

2026: The New Red Tape Machine Arrives -- The MACF/CBAM

Warning to importing SMEs: from January 1, 2026, a new administrative obligation drops.

The MACF (Mecanisme d'Ajustement Carbone aux Frontieres), also known as CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism), enters its definitive phase on January 1, 2026.

What This Means in Practice

Obligation Detail
Mandatory status Become an "authorized CBAM declarant" before any import
Products concerned Steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizers, hydrogen, electricity
Data required Complete carbon footprint of imported products (direct + indirect emissions)
Certificate purchases From February 2027 for 2026 emissions
Mandatory verification By an accredited verifier starting in 2026
Certificate price Indexed to the carbon quota market (~60-65 EUR/ton CO2)

The Administrative Burden for SMEs

For each imported product containing steel or aluminum (screws, mechanical parts, equipment...), the entrepreneur must:

  1. Contact their foreign supplier to obtain CO2 emission data
  2. Calculate "intrinsic emissions" according to European methodology
  3. Register as an authorized declarant with the DGEC
  4. Purchase CBAM certificates corresponding to emissions
  5. File an annual CBAM declaration before May 31

"You thought URSSAF declarations were complicated? Wait until you have to calculate the carbon footprint of your screws imported from China."

Exemption for Small Volumes

The EU has provided an exemption: imports of less than 50 tons per year (excluding electricity and hydrogen) are not subject to CBAM.

But for an industrial SME importing metal components, this threshold can be reached quickly.

The Cost for Businesses

Cost Item Estimate
CBAM certificates 60-65 EUR/ton of CO2
Consultant/verifier Variable (1,000 EUR - 10,000 EUR/year)
Administrative time Not quantified but significant
Non-compliance risk Fines to be determined

Meanwhile: the civil servants who designed this red tape machine will have no carbon declaration to make for their own activity. The elected officials who voted for it will still have no receipts to provide for their representation expenses.

Sources: Ministry of Ecological Transition, French Customs, Bpifrance


URSSAF Audits: The Adjustment Machine

Indicator Figure Source
URSSAF audits/year 105,000 URSSAF 2022
Adjustment rate 83% URSSAF
Amount adjusted (2023) 1.177 Bn EUR NetPME
2027 target 5 Bn EUR Minister

83% of URSSAF audits result in an adjustment. The average amount: 201,804 EUR per adjustment.

The entrepreneur must justify every euro:

  • Every business expense
  • Every kilometer
  • Every business meal
  • Every hire
  • Every benefit in kind

Any error = adjustment + surcharges + penalties.

Source: URSSAF -- The audit

The Entrepreneur's Charges

TNS (Self-Employed Worker) Social Charges

Status Charges on net compensation
TNS (majority manager SARL, sole proprietorship) ~45%
Assimilated employee (SAS president) ~70-75%

Concrete example:

For net compensation of 60,000 EUR/year:

  • TNS Director: total cost 86,000 EUR (charges 26,000 EUR)
  • Employee Director: total cost 103,000 EUR (charges 43,000 EUR)

Source: Le Coin des Entrepreneurs, Bpifrance Creation

Corporate Tax

Bracket Rate 2024
Profits up to 42,500 EUR (SMEs) 15%
Profits > 42,500 EUR 25%
Social contribution +3.3% if corporate tax > 763,000 EUR
Large companies (>3 Bn EUR revenue) Up to 36.13%

On top of this: CFE, CVAE (declining), property taxes, VAT collected, and all payroll deductions on employees' wages.

Source: Ministry of Economy


The Civil Servant: Zero Risk, Zero Control

13 dismissals out of 2.5 million agents: a rate 415 times lower than the private sector.

Absolute Job Security

Indicator Figure Source
Dismissals for professional inadequacy (FPE 2022) 13 IFRAP
FPE workforce 2,500,000 DGAFP
Public service dismissal rate < 0.01% -
Private sector permanent contract dismissal rate 4.15% -
Revocations/year (all public services) ~800 -

13 dismissals for professional inadequacy in 2022 out of 2.5 million state public service agents.

That is a rate of 0.0005%. Compare this to 4.15% dismissals in the private sector.

The difference in treatment is 415 times more favorable to the civil servant.

Source: IFRAP -- Civil Servant Dismissals

European Comparison

Country Share of contractual employees in public service
Sweden 98%
Italy 85%
Denmark 78%
France 21%

In Sweden, 98% of public agents are on contracts, just like in the private sector. They can be dismissed. In France, 79% are tenured with a virtually guaranteed job for life.


Elected Officials: The Supreme Privilege

2.9 million euros in representation expenses with absolutely no receipts required.

Official Mayor Allowances

Municipality Population Monthly Gross Allowance (2024)
< 500 inhabitants 1,048 EUR
500 - 999 1,657 EUR
1,000 - 3,499 2,121 EUR
3,500 - 9,999 2,261 EUR
10,000 - 19,999 3,421 EUR
>= 100,000 inhabitants 5,960 EUR

Source: Relyens, AMF

Representation Expenses: The No-Receipt Envelope

Here is the scandal that few French citizens know about:

Article L2123-19 of the General Code of Local Authorities: "The municipal council may vote, from ordinary resources, allowances to the mayor for representation expenses."

What this means in practice:

  • No legal ceiling
  • No official scale
  • No receipts required
  • Each municipality freely sets the amount

"Audits are rare, reimbursements exceptional, and sanctions nonexistent." -- Mediapart

Source: Maire-Info, Public Senat

Representation Expenses Figures (2024)

Indicator Figure
Total amount spent 2.9 million EUR
Number of officials concerned 1,288
Median amount 624 EUR/year
Maximum amount Paris 19,720 EUR/year

For some officials, the amounts are much more substantial. And unlike the entrepreneur who must provide a receipt for the smallest coffee, the mayor has nothing to justify.

The Anne Hidalgo Case

The National Financial Prosecutor's Office opened a file following Mediapart revelations:

73,700 EUR in clothing expenses spread over 241 items.

The Seban and Associates law firm recalls that "catering, everyday consumer products, clothing and aesthetics do not fall within the scope of representation expenses chargeable to the municipal budget."

Yet they were paid.

Source: Planet.fr


The Comparison Table: Two Worlds

Audits, risks, and receipts for one; zero guarantees and total security for the other.

Criterion Entrepreneur Civil Servant
Risk of job loss Bankruptcy (67,830 in 2024) Virtually none (13 dismissals/2.5M)
Risk of audit 105,000 URSSAF audits/year Formal evaluation
Adjustment rate 83% of audits N/A
Receipts required Everything must be proven None for representation expenses (officials)
Social protection Paid at 45% of net income Paid by the State (i.e., by workers)
Retirement Uncertain (CIPAV, SSI) Guaranteed + special schemes
Income in case of hardship RSA if bankrupt Salary maintained

The Real Ratio: Who Creates Wealth?

One market producer funds 1.7 people dependent on mandatory contributions.

Market Value Added

Indicator France EU Average
Market value added (% GDP) 69.6% 74.1%
Non-market production (% GDP) ~22% -

Non-market production (government administration, education, public healthcare) represents 22% of GDP but is measured by costs (mainly wages), not by actual output.

In other words: we measure what it costs, not what it produces.

Source: IFRAP, INSEE

The Dependency Equation

Simplified:

  • Market wealth producers: ~14 million (private market sector)
  • Consumers of this wealth: ~24 million (civil servants + retirees + inactive population)

The real ratio is not "1.77 workers for 1 retiree."

It's more like: 1 market producer for 1.7 people dependent on mandatory contributions.


What the Numbers Reveal

The entrepreneur funds their own protection and everyone else's, with no reciprocity or guarantee.

The System's Asymmetry

  1. The entrepreneur pays for everyone: their contributions fund their own social protection, that of their employees, AND that of civil servants and retirees.

  2. The civil servant is paid by everyone: their salary comes from taxes levied on market production.

  3. The elected official is accountable to no one: envelopes with no receipts, in a country where the smallest craftsman must document every cent.

The Absence of Reciprocity

What the entrepreneur brings What they receive in return
Job creation Audits, charges, bankruptcy risk
Value creation (VA) Contributions to fund non-market sector
Innovation, risk-taking No guarantee, RSA if failure
What the civil servant brings What they receive in return
Public service (variable quality) Job guaranteed for life
No financial risk Guaranteed retirement
Regulated work No URSSAF audit

Conclusion: A System at Breaking Point

The numbers are stubborn:

  • 67,830 bankruptcies in 2024, a record since 2009
  • 83% of URSSAF audits end in adjustment
  • 13 dismissals for professional inadequacy out of 2.5 million state civil servants
  • 2.9 million euros in representation expenses with no receipts for elected officials

The French system rests on a structural inequality: those who create wealth bear all the risk and undergo all the controls, while those who consume it enjoy virtually absolute protection.

This asymmetry is not a theory. These are official facts, published by INSEE, URSSAF, Bank of France, and DGAFP.

The question is not whether public service is useful. The question is: how long can this imbalance hold?

With 1.77 workers for 1 retiree, 67,830 bankruptcies per year, and a state that has spent more than it collects for 50 consecutive years, the mathematical answer is clear: not forever.



Related Articles -- Society & Politics France

Official Sources


Last updated: January 2026 -- Added MACF/CBAM (carbon border adjustment) section

Share:

Want to know more?

Discover all our articles and guides to master crypto.

View all articles